Perfection can be tedious. Continuous tasting of excellent wines leads to fatigue, and excellence involves the repetition of tastings, although it is unique.

Perfection is a specific pattern in which a certain proportion relates all titers, where nothing can be added or taken away, and such extremely wise and profound statements usually put me in a good mood. Unfortunately, to achieve perfection, you have to repeat efforts, and many have already been made so that every next repetition is monotonous, like having the same fiancée repeatedly.

Looking at all this and wanting only faults and neighbours with character, we should realize a rather ugly statement: character is usually a crack in perfection, a break in which too much minerality has nestled, or some Brett, a mother-in-law’s stinginess, a cousin’s spite, snoring wives. It is precisely such elements, nasty rather than outstanding, that build temper. However, a consequence of similar reasoning may be the search for wines with character among poor wines (these are only sometimes hidden in discount stores), and the apparent contradiction presented here is worth taking a closer look at and splitting hairs.

On the other hand, uniqueness is not related to perfection; it is somewhat related to nasty character. When it comes to wines, we remember longer those in which something hit us, something started to sting, like a tick in the groin. Producers do not offer such wines to the general market because the average customer looks for repeatability, just as he looks for eternity in a film frame by stopping time.

Perfection can be tedious

Therefore, manufacturers build patterns in their laboratories by an average standard that approaches perfection and make products according to the bar to earn money, not to repeat Mother Nature or God.